-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Create a ResultInfo #1372
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create a ResultInfo #1372
Conversation
Signed-off-by: paul.profizi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: paul.profizi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: paul.profizi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: paul.profizi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: paul.profizi <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1372 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 87.51% 87.58% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 81 81
Lines 9360 9387 +27
==========================================
+ Hits 8191 8222 +31
+ Misses 1169 1165 -4 |
Signed-off-by: paul.profizi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: paul.profizi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: paul.profizi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: paul.profizi <[email protected]>
| This class describes the metadata of the analysis and the available results. | ||
| .. note:: | ||
| Creating a new ResultInfo from an analysis type and physics type is currently only available |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see that you add more more capabilities available witha single server type, I'm afraid that it's going to make the library hard to use :/ (I found the issue with the streams class 2 days ago)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you following up to expand to other server types after?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cbellot000 definitely, yes. But this can be merged first to allow for a custom operator to create a ResultInfo.
Signed-off-by: paul.profizi <[email protected]>
Allow creation of a ResultInfo. Only available for InProcess for now.